Tag Archive for System

4 Varying Kinds Of Mobile Computer Gadgets

Different kinds of portable computer gadgets may include the following: smartphones, laptops, netbook computers, and tablet PCs.

Technology has provided us with an array of choices in portable computer gadgets. These devices may have computer functions that are similar to each other, but they also have a number of other qualities that make each one standout. If you you’re planning to buy yourself one of these gadgets, go over this article to know more about each kind so you can decide which is best for you.

Smartphones

A smartphone is a combination of a personal organizer and a mobile phone. It is a little device that looks a lot more like a PDA than a regular cellphone, but it has a complex operating system to allow its “smart” features. At the same time, it also provides simplicity of use to its users. The user interface of smartphones is also better than ordinary mobile phones, with larger screens and QWERTY keypads. There are also numerous programs and productivity software that can be used on these gadgets, like mailers, organizers, spreadsheets, word processing programs, and internet browsers, among many others. Moreover, these devices boast 1 or 2 cameras and allow users take and view pictures or video clips in numerous file formats. As opposed to ordinary cellphones, smartphones can be connected in numerous ways, like through Wi-Fi, 3G, as well as WiMax. Even a LAN network is easily done with these devices. If you need to transfer files from or to your smartphone, you can either do it through USB connections or its Bluetooth feature.

Laptop computers

Also known to manufacturers as notebook computers, a laptop is a personal computer that can be brought around to such places as libraries, planes, office meetings and temporary offices. This is because, unlike desktop computers, laptops are normally smaller than an attache case and can be powered both by battery or AC. They also usually weigh less than 5 pounds and have a width of three inches or less. This gadget, though, is more costly than a desktop computer with the same attributes because of the complexity involved in trying to get all the same features into a much more compact machine. But what also make them more useful desktop computers is that they can be used either as a laptop or desktop computer.

Netbook computers

Netbook computers are new versions of laptop computers that are characterized by their size, price and a few other properties. These new devices are small, affordable, with low horsepower, and run on a system software that is either old or unfamiliar. The size of the monitors vary from 9 to 10 inches, and they have a keyboard that is quite similar to that of laptops. They also have a weight of only about 2-3 pounds. This types of computer is very convenient, indeed. However, 1 certain feature that this gadget does not have is the optical drive of laptops. CD and DVD drives have been taken out from this types of gadget to allow for its small size and weight.

Tablet PC

A tablet PC is another kind of computer that you can carry anywhere with you. With its wireless network card, you can conveniently connect to the Internet to check your email, chat with friends, update your social network status, or look for ipad support. What makes this gadget special, though, is that it does not fold or have a keyboard like that of a laptop. This device is just a single tablet that you operate either by making use of a stylus pen or the tips of your fingers.

Because these gadgets are available in varied prices and with different features, it is essential that you ascertain your needs first and then choose the gadget that is closest to the rate you can afford, and also offers the most important features for you. Be well informed before making a decision.


Advantages & Disadvantages of Windows 3.1

Windows 3.1 is an operating system that was released in 1992 as a successor to Windows 3.0, which was later discontinued when Windows 95 came out. This classic program ran off MS-DOS, which later fell-out of compatibility in future versions. As many programs released at the time ran off of MS-DOS as well, some gamers harkened back for the old days of Windows 3.1. The upgrades to Windows in time after Windows 3.1 have improved in some ways and have lost functionality in others.

Basic Machines

  • If you find yourself with a very basic, old computer running with a 286 or 386 processor, running a version of Windows later than 3.1 will make the computer much too slow. Windows 3.1 will function better if there are at least 16 MB of RAM inside. Also, if you have a low-end Pentium or a 486, Windows 3.1 will run much faster than Windows 95.

Simplicity

  • From Windows 95 onward, Microsoft has put a stronger emphasis on being able to do many processes at once. This can lead to cluttered desktops and tough-to-navigate files and folders. Windows 3.1 goes back to a much simpler time when people only wanted to do one or two things at once. Running an old computer with one application at a time is a simple task for Windows 3.1. As there were fewer programs on Windows 3.1, there tend to be fewer kinds of error messages than the more complicated error codes in later operating systems.

Running Windows 3.1 Now

  • As it is nearly 20 years since Windows 3.1 was created, there are problems making the operating system compatible with today’s software and hardware. Most new video and sound cards will not have drivers that work with Windows 3.1. By the same token, most software that has come out since 1995 is too advanced for Windows 3.1 to run and they will run at a snail’s pace or not at all.

Speed and Crashing

  • Despite the fact that there are fewer possible error messages on Windows 3.1, if you try to run several programs at a time, there will often be a lag or an error. Windows 3.1 uses a cooperative multitasking system, which means that your computer attempts to give equal memory to all programs at once. This means that the more programs you open, the more divided the memory. Enough programs open (more than 3) and the operating system has a tendency to crash.

The World’s Most Advanced 3D Mouse

Despite the fact that most professionals actively involved in technological design and engineering pretty much rely on normal mice while working in 3D modeling applications, the truth of the matter is that there are also certain specialized devices available out there, which will be able to deliver an enhanced level of functionality and improve the workflow. And that’s exactly the case with the device you’re about to see as follows, namely the SpacePilot PRO 3D Mouse, which has just been introduced by 3Dconnexion.

According to 3Dconnexion (which, by the way, is a Logitech subsidiary), the new peripheral can deliver “advanced control of 3D models, easier access to the raw power of professional 3D applications, fewer interruptions in the design workflow, and superior comfort.”

One of the main new features provided by the fresh 3Dconnexion mouse is the LCD Workflow Assistant, namely a color LCD that lists function-key assignments and provides quick access to Microsoft Outlook e-mail, calendar and task lists, allowing professionals to access important information for a fully integrated design experience.

Another important feature worth mentioning about the SpacePilot PRO is the advanced MCAD navigation system, consisting of five new dual-function QuickView Navigation keys that improve error detection, design review, and design presentation by providing one-touch access to the following views: top and bottom, right and left, front and back, two isometric views, and 90-degree view rotation of any view either clockwise or counter-clockwise – for a total of 32 views. In addition, fresh Navigation Setting keys offer simplified and customizable control, allowing users to turn pan-and-zoom, rotation and one-axis control on or off, making it easier to define navigation settings for certain work modes.

Furthermore, the device sports five new fully customizable, dual-function keys that offer immediate, one-touch access to 10 frequently used commands, at the same time being able to deliver a high level of comfort, via the sculpted, soft-coated wrist rest that positions the hand in relation to the controller cap to support a balanced workflow. The micro-precision six-degrees-of-freedom sensor allows for fingertip control with minimal effort from the arm, wrist and hand, while frequently used commands are conveniently positioned at your fingertips. The intuitive and symmetrical layout of the function keys makes the device usable with either hand.

As expected, the peripheral from 3Dconnexion is more expensive than your average peripheral, the SpacePilot PRO selling for around $499, which, however, is a price most pros may pay gladly, given the features this thing can deliver.

ESET NOD32 Antivirus 5 Reviews

CNET editors’ review

Reviewed by: Seth Rosenblatt on September 15, 2011

The bottom line: Back from the nearly dead, or at least the un-updated, ESET returns with high-level security that’s light on your system. For a basic antivirus suite that’s light on your system and tough on malware, NOD32 gets a yes from us.

Review:

The last time ESET updated its two security suites–the antivirus and anti-malware-only NOD32 and the more feature-heavy alternative Smart Security–it was a different computer security world. It was March 2009: Anonymous barely existed, Stuxnet hadn’t gone public, and ransomware was the stuff of science fiction.

Version 5 of ESET NOD32 is a solid, creative attempt to create a suite that adapts to a rapidly changing threatscape, with an emphasis on generic detections and the now-commonplace reliance on both cloud and locally stored detections. Where NOD32′s bigger brother Smart Security 5 left us wanting more in the ancillary features department, the area that many don’t consider “core” security, NOD32 strikes a perfect pitch between features, price, and effectiveness.

Installation
ESET’s installation could be faster, although it’s by no means sluggish. It’s slowed down by a preponderance of screens, including registration, and an unnecessary query as to whether or not the user wants Potentially Unwanted Program (PUP) protection activated or not. While a legitimate query, there’s no reason for it to slow down the install by yet another screen to click through.

PUPs are definitely a security issue, though, so perhaps the program ought to just scan for them on the first scan automatically, and then ask you if it’s a scan you always want.

One decent thing about the registration process is that it’s all done from within the suite–no need to jump to your browser. Also, there’s no reboot required after the installation. Still, the one-minute-or-less installs from Norton and Trend Micro should be a goal that all security suites aspire to.

Interface
The layout of ESET 5 remains unchanged from version 4, except for minor details, although neither is quite as easy to use as it ought to be. The interface opens to a window indicating your security status. The default is colored green and labeled Maximum Protection, which changes to red and a warning when core security features, such as Network Protection, have been disabled. The center pane doesn’t indicate this very clearly, but the plain text Maximum Protection labels that tell you which parts of your computer and activity are protected are actually links. Click one to drill deeper into your settings, toggle features, and gain more granular control over your security.

The left nav lets you access other features, including Computer Scan, Update, Setup, Tools, and Help. To the interface’s credit, each tab’s layout is kept similar, and there are helpful mouse-over tooltips that help clarify things like the differences between default scans, but key features, like the Advanced Settings window, are hard to find.

Along with a lack of clarity about how to get around ESET’s interface is the confusion created by redundancy. There’s nothing gained by making things harder to find, and even savvy users will probably have to take more time than necessary to get up to speed.

Features and support
ESET NOD32 5′s core features put the suite at or near the top of its class. Its collection of features, while not revolutionary, are nevertheless extremely well implemented. What it lacks are many of the modern ancillary features that justify the higher price.

On the side of the basics, there are two default scans: a “Smart Scan” and a custom scan. ESET has improved its antivirus and antispyware engines so that they don’t detect only threats, but prevent your host files from corruption before the bad guys go after you. There’s removable media control, so you can block USB keys or external drives from connecting to your computer, and the new gamer mode automatically initiates silent running whenever a program is running at full screen. This is perfect for movies and presentations, as well as games. You can also activate it from the system tray.

ThreatSense, ESET’s cloud-based detection, isn’t new–yep, it had it three years ago–but it’s been expanded in version 5 to include reputation analysis. All of that comes in the basic NOD32. Upping to Smart Security gets you antispam, parental controls, and a “smart” firewall that learns how your computer uses the Internet very quickly.

ESET’s browser guards are browser-agnostic, and don’t require an extension. You won’t get search results ratings, but ESET successfully blocked us from attempting to reach known dangerous Web sites clicked on in search results.

It’s not too much of a stretch to say that ESET owns the Support space. In addition to the hot-line support, forums and knowledge base, no other security suite offers an education module like ESET does. Called “Cybersecurity Training,” the module features an interactive city that you can explore to learn about how to protect yourself, your personal data, and your computer when online. It’s an in-depth approach that we wish other vendors would take, because at the end of the day, it’s going to be your own wits that keep you safest.

It’s accessible from the installation CD if you buy the physical boxed copy of the program, and we’re not sure just yet about how to launch it from the downloadable version.

Performance
ESET’s overall performance presents a reliable security option. It’s not the most effective security suite we’ve seen this year, and the benchmarks leave room for growth, but overall it’s a solid, secure choice, with low false positives and a light touch on your computer’s performance.

Real-world test results for ESET were confusing. On our real-world test computer, an x86 Windows 7 laptop that we use for all hands-on testing of security suites, ESET scans were invariably slow and ponderous. On average, the first scan took nearly two hours, and subsequent scans were only faster by about 20 to 30 minutes. These marks did not match up to CNET Labs’ results, which found ESET’s scan times on a freshly imaged computer to be among the fastest results we’ve seen so far this year. Because of the large number of programs that get installed and uninstalled on the real-world laptop, which could adversely affect the computer’s Registry, we’re inclined to favor the labs results in this case.

CNET Labs’ benchmarks found both ESET Smart Security 5 and ESET NOD32 5 to have performed generally well above average. Note that we can’t directly compare this year’s results with last year’s because we upgraded our testing computer from Windows 7 x64 to Windows 7 x64 with Service Pack 1.

Smart Security slowed down the Labs’ computer boot time by an average of 17.2 seconds–five seconds faster than the average of all suites tested to date this year–whereas NOD32 5 added an impressively low 13.9 seconds. For both programs, ESET’s boot time impact was minimal.

Both suites had a small impact on the computer’s shutdown time, slowing it down only by about six to seven seconds longer than an unprotected computer. However, it should be noted that the shutdown time for an unprotected computer was half that, so even though ESET’s impact was minimal when compared with other suites, it’s still having a big affect on the computer itself.

On all of CNET’s in-use system performance tests except for the Cinebench test, ESET’s impact was extremely minimal. The Cinebench results were close to the average level of impact. So, all things being equal, you’re not going to notice much when ESET is running as you go about your computing business. This was borne out by our real-world tests, too.

Conclusion
ESET returns to a tougher security world, not just from the competition but from the threats that it’s meant to protect you against. Though the benchmarking is generally solid, we found the interface too annoying and the installation too cumbersome to award it higher marks.